USEFUL STUFF
- [Eco] It’s Not about Polar Bears Anymore
- [Nano] One small wall crawling step for a bottle of coke, one giant leap to Spiderman-like wall crawling
- [Future] Saving the World Through Game Design
- [Economy] Financial crisis simplified (a whiteboard presentation) (detailed info here)
- [Man-made] Robot suit for rent in Japan to help people walk
- [Astronomy] 50 Consumer Technologies Developed by NASA in the Last 50 Years
ENTERTAINMENT
- The Indonesian Mimic Octopus
- The Quietest Place on Earth – Orfield Labs
- MadTv – Kim Jong IL Crazy Parody
- Pictures Galore: 15 Epic Water and Ice Formations and Phenomena, 7 Spectacularly Skilled High-Speed Photographers, Fantastic Plastic: 20 Essential Works of LEGO Art
- The former President wants you to know exactly where he stands… (kind of old, but Clinton’s never looked more convincing:)
- Wacky human inventions from 1930’s (brilliant…ROFL’d through half of it)
WEEKLY TRIBUTE
A small tribute to priorities. On the top of my list is to graduate before my birthday next year and I’ve already noticed my interest in the last two weeks or so (when I started) has noticeably shifted from all the things that interest me to only (well…mostly, but it’s a start!) those that I’ll be needing to graduate.
My topic, in case you’re interested: a sustainable zero-energy – or if possible even plus-energy (and notice how informational the article is) – residential area in a city (probably and preferably Ljubljana). Why? Because I strongly believe that starting the next industrial revolution is the only (for the time being, at least:)) way to successfully maintain and continue our lifestyles without any serious consequences; both to the abundance of options we have at our disposal as humans, as to, of course, mother nature.
…and someday who knows, you’ll might even quote me on this;)
Till then, I’ll leave you with another quote, a brand new one as a matter of fact…not exactly the bedtime story I had in mind last week:
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it’s only a hundred billion. It’s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
- Richard Feynman
.
(via: all the usual and unusual blogs and sites that I’ve got in Google Reader)







